as i get older

my eyes are opened wider as to the scope and depth to which our governmental systems are due to be completely revamped.

there are not many ways to say how it is except, corrupt, evil, perverted, degenerated, dishonest and greedy.

now that may sound harsh...maybe even treasonous...but think about it. it's being truthful.

have you, or anyone you know, ever had to deal with any governmental entities? ask them to explain if they had POSITIVE experiences when dealing with them. i think it would be safe to say that few, if any, would have anything pleasant to say about their experiences.

I've discovered that most governmental entities do not care whether the people they are supposed to "serve" live or die and really DO NOT CARE ONE WAY OR THE OTHER. all they re interested in is that their monies are collected...to the penny.

it does not matter to them if payment rendered to them will leave you penniless, hungry and on the streets and virtually no excuse is acceptable for not rendering payments to their demands (which more often than not, are unreasonable)

woe be unto you if you dare to contest them...you're subjected to an array of paperwork, affidavits, forms and filings, interviews with people who have no personality or soul, and, often times, fees that make your head swim...you're made to feel like a criminal if you're just trying to assert your rights and collect your rightful due.

i read a recent communication from one entity informing the recipient that the only reason their request was granted was due to their good, past, record...NOT because of surrounding circumstances, beyond their control, that forced the person (or persons) into very bad situation where decisions had to be made that brought dire circumstances down on that person(s) due to no making of their own...and those decisions could literally have left the person(s) homeless, destitute, broke, penniless and on the streets...

the very fact that the person(s) made the decision to be able to have a home instead of meeting one of their demands was inconsequential. this communication intimated that the governmental demand should have been met instead of choosing to have a home in which to live.

in all...a very sobering and frightfully factual, not theoretical, situation that is being played out more often than one would ever imagine in this day and age. a scenario that should NOT be played under any reasonable circumstance yet very real and "reasonable" according to our governmental entities...why do we let it go in?